M31 CGM 工作台M31 CGM / New-ANGELS III
目录Contents

组会（最新一天：2026-10-16）Group meeting (latest day: 2026-10-16)

成果：红队 RT-02/RT-03/RT-04/RT-05/RT-06/RT-07 全部分诊完毕。集中核上限对插值方式敏感 2.0–2.3 倍（样条比线性松），收敛值待 A1d；Zhang 比值改为「≳4×」——RT-07 后写作「排除 Zhang 的名义中值剖面」，不写「排除叠加预期」（Zhang 未发布协方差）；E023 的「β = 0.6 时 r_c ≤ 200 全部排除」撤回，E023 将在流量空间于谱曲面上重做；外/内比较的稳妥说法改为「约 10–15% 内一致」（随机效应 0.94 ± 0.11）；v19 总量确认为局部单起始基线，最终总量来自 A1d 剖面曲面；Locatelli 措辞改为「有条件紧张」；未解源括号改为 0.12–0.33 F；NW 超出的 SP/QPB 比值约为其余十场的 3×（事后），倾向软质子。E027（PI 2026-10-16 两次要求，范围后改为全部 31 个 LP 观测）：stage 0/0b 灯光曲线级筛查完成——GATE 不可用（丢 5–6 个主场）；FLR_z3 与 MS_z3.5_core 清洗相同、代价不同（2–3% vs ~10% 曝光）；主要价值是覆盖（可能把多达约 11 个非 v19 指向变成可用场）；谱级 stage 1 的指标已预注册，1a GTI 导出已派发。工作：A1d 运行中（~1240/1638，ETA ~09:30Z）；E026 stage 1 试点第 8 次尝试后 Virgo ssh 自 06:16Z 起不可达，状态未知；RT-08（A2 toy-MC 校准）报告已交、RT-09（外样本选择）运行中，两队分诊待定。问题：RT-02 的 Hermes 臂两次未出报告（转 codexnim 臂后 03:08Z 出）；E026 试点反复失败（SAS wrapper shim）；Virgo ssh 中断；多条声明被红队推翻/收窄（见 meetings.html）。待 PI 决定：无。

Results: red teams RT-02/RT-03/RT-04/RT-05/RT-06/RT-07 are all triaged. The compact-core UL is interpolation-sensitive by 2.0–2.3× (spline looser than linear), the converged value awaits A1d; the Zhang ratio becomes "≳4×" — after RT-07 written as "exclude the nominal median Zhang profile", never "exclude the stacked expectation" (Zhang publishes no covariance); E023's "at β = 0.6 even r_c ≤ 200" clause is withdrawn and E023 will be redone in flux space on spectral surfaces; the outer/inner comparison's safe wording becomes "agree within ~10–15%" (random effects 0.94 ± 0.11); the v19 total is confirmed as a local single-start baseline, the final total coming from the A1d profile surfaces; the Locatelli wording becomes "conditional tension"; the unresolved-source bracket becomes 0.12–0.33 F; the NW excess's SP/QPB ratio is about 3× the other ten (a posteriori), leaning towards soft protons. E027 (the PI's two 2026-10-16 requests, later rescoped to all 31 LP observations): the stage-0/0b light-curve screen is done — GATE is unusable (it drops 5–6 primaries); FLR_z3 and MS_z3.5_core clean identically at different cost (2–3% vs ~10% of the exposure); the main value is coverage (up to ~11 non-v19 pointings may become usable fields); the spectral stage-1 metrics are pre-registered and the 1a GTI export is dispatched. Work: A1d is running (~1240/1638, ETA ~09:30Z); E026's stage-1 pilot was on attempt 8 when Virgo ssh went unreachable at 06:16Z, so its status is unknown; RT-08 (the A2 toy-MC calibration) has filed its report and RT-09 (outer-sample selection) is running, both triages Pending. Problems: RT-02's Hermes arm produced no report twice (the codexnim arm reported at 03:08Z); the E026 pilot keeps failing (SAS wrapper shim); the Virgo ssh outage; several claims were overturned/narrowed by the red teams (see meetings.html). For the PI: none.

来源：cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md（RT-02…RT-09 行）；cognition-os/experiments/E013、E023、E016、E014、E027 与 cognition-os/insights/I033、I034 的「Red-team RT-0x triage」与 stage 0/0b 节；cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md 48–55 行；.agent/LOOP_STATE.md。前两天：2026-10-15（RT-01 分诊、D50、E025、A2 v2 final）· 2026-10-14（D48 冻结、D49、E014/A2 v1/E016/E019/E020/E021）。

Source: cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md (the RT-02…RT-09 rows); the "Red-team RT-0x triage" and stage-0/0b sections of cognition-os/experiments/E013, E023, E016, E014, E027 and cognition-os/insights/I033, I034; rows 48–55 of cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md; .agent/LOOP_STATE.md. Earlier days: 2026-10-15 (RT-01 triaged, D50, E025, A2 v2 final) · 2026-10-14 (D48 frozen, D49, E014/A2 v1/E016/E019/E020/E021).

最新状态（实时，下次刷新写入正文）Live status (folded into the pages at the next refresh)

以下条目在本次网页刷新之后出现，由 Claude 在分诊时从记录中摘写，未经 Hermes 改写。These items arrived after this site refresh; Claude wrote them from the records at triage time, and Hermes has not yet rewritten them.

全部 8 条最新状态 →All 8 live entries →

工作台：M31 的星系周介质（New-ANGELS III）Workbench: the circumgalactic medium of M31 (New-ANGELS III)

这是什么项目？What is this project?

M31（仙女座星系）是离我们最近的大型旋涡星系。宇宙学认为星系的大部分普通物质（重子）不在星系内部，而在星系周围几十万光年的星系周介质（CGM）——百万度的稀薄气体。本项目用 XMM-Newton 的 22 个指向（proposal 080073，PI J. Li）在 M31 内晕（投影半径 10.5–30.8 kpc）逐视线测量弥漫软 X 射线发射，把「银河系前景 + M31 内晕」的总和（记号 CGMsum）测准，再用空间形状限制其中有多少属于 M31。测量已冻结（D48，2026-10-14）：14 个主样本场的 CGMsum 吸收流量为 0.965 ± 0.044（单位 10⁻¹⁵ erg cm⁻² s⁻¹ arcmin⁻²），共温 kT = 0.17531 ± 0.00436 keV。

M31 (Andromeda) is the nearest large spiral galaxy. Cosmology says most of a galaxy's ordinary matter (baryons) is not inside the galaxy but in the circumgalactic medium (CGM), million-degree thin gas around it. Using 22 XMM-Newton pointings (proposal 080073, PI J. Li) toward the M31 inner halo (projected radii 10.5–30.8 kpc), this project measures the diffuse soft X-ray emission sightline by sightline, pins down the sum "Milky Way foreground + M31 inner halo" (notation CGMsum), and then limits how much belongs to M31 from its spatial shape. The measurement is frozen (D48, 2026-10-14): the 14 primary fields give CGMsum absorbed flux 0.965 ± 0.044 (units 10⁻¹⁵ erg cm⁻² s⁻¹ arcmin⁻²), common kT = 0.17531 ± 0.00436 keV.

来源：cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md（2026-10-14 D48 块）；cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D48；cognition-os/insights/I033（0.965 ± 0.044，χ²=11.99/13）。

Source: cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md (2026-10-14 D48 block); cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D48; cognition-os/insights/I033 (0.965 ± 0.044, χ²=11.99/13).

现在进展如何？Where does it stand?

测量冻结；v19 基线（14 场）可信，但红队 RT-04（已分诊）确认它是局部单起始基线——同模型多元起始把 14 场均值移到 0.891（−7.7%），最终总量将来自 A1d 剖面曲面，模型 B/C 作拓扑系统误差；±0.044 只是统计误差。轮廓在 10.5–29 kpc 内平（χ²=11.99/13）。E013 A2 v1 完成：无 M31 分量被偏好（Δstat ≤ 1.07），集中式 M31 β 晕（r_c ≤ 8 kpc，MW 常数）在 R=20 kpc 的单侧 95% 上限（插值版）为 0.047–0.164，toy-MC 覆盖率 0.975–0.984（略保守）；红队 RT-02（已分诊）指出该上限对插值方式敏感 2.0–2.3 倍（样条比线性松），收敛值待 A1d，且 Zhang 比值应写作「≳4×」而非「≳5×」。A2 v2（模型 C 曲面，敏感性变体）给出 β = 0.5 时 r_c = 4/8/15/30 kpc 上限 0.111/0.138/0.215/0.484（toy-MC 覆盖率 0.918–0.933，Δstat=2.71 在此略不保守，需校准阈值）。外样本从 8 个方向扩到 26 个已拟合方向（23 个有双侧误差）：干净外样本（13 场，无未掩展源）吸收流量 IVW 0.846 ± 0.059 vs 内场 0.965 ± 0.044，固定效应外/内 = 0.877 ± 0.072；含未掩展源的全部 23 场 0.831 ± 0.045。红队 RT-03（已分诊）：随机效应给外/内 = 0.94 ± 0.11，逐一剔除 0.83–0.99——稳妥说法是外场与内场在约 10–15% 内一致，「外场更暗」不稳健。E023 完成：内+外联合拟合把大核 M31 晕在 20 kpc 的单侧 95% 上限压到 0.46（r_c=50）／0.59（r_c=100）／0.90（r_c=200）（β = 0.5）——Zhang 名义中值剖面 0.83 被排除到 r_c ≲ 125/175 kpc（β = 0.4/0.5）；红队 RT-02 后「β = 0.6 时 r_c ≤ 200 全部排除」已撤回（15% 外场斑块底噪给 UL 0.90–1.06，该端边际），E023 将在流量空间于谱曲面上重做；EAGLE fiducial 0.51 到 r_c ≲ 45/65/85 kpc（β = 0.4/0.5/0.6）。红队 RT-01 已分诊：E020 模型 C 的「−15%」不是 SP 谱形系统误差。红队 RT-06（已分诊）：D49 原文成立——RASS 只排除宽的 R45 亮超出，OMNI 只排除 OMNI 追踪的高通量 SWCX，NW 四场 SP/QPB 比值约为其余十场 3×（事后）——NW 超出仍是「未解释」，但倾向软质子。A1d、E026 stage 1 与新红队 RT-08/RT-09 在跑，结果待定。

The measurement is frozen and the v19 baseline (14 fields) is trusted, but red team RT-04 (triaged) confirms it is a local single-start baseline — same-model multi-start moves the 14-field mean to 0.891 (−7.7%), the final total will come from the A1d profile surfaces with Models B/C as a topology systematic, and ±0.044 is statistical only. The profile is flat over 10.5–29 kpc (χ²=11.99/13). E013 A2 v1 is done: no M31 component is preferred (Δstat ≤ 1.07), and the one-sided 95% upper limit (interpolated) on a concentrated M31 beta halo (r_c ≤ 8 kpc, MW constant) at R = 20 kpc is 0.047–0.164, with toy-MC coverage 0.975–0.984 (slightly conservative); red team RT-02 (triaged) finds that limit interpolation-sensitive by 2.0–2.3× (spline looser than linear), the converged value awaits A1d, and the Zhang ratio should be written "≳4×", not "≳5×". A2 v2 (on the Model-C surfaces, a sensitivity variant) gives, for β = 0.5 at r_c = 4/8/15/30 kpc, limits of 0.111/0.138/0.215/0.484 (toy-MC coverage 0.918–0.933, so the Δstat=2.71 rule is slightly anti-conservative here and needs a calibrated threshold). The outer sample has grown from 8 to 26 fitted directions (23 with two-sided errors): the clean outer sample (13 fields without an unmasked extended target) has absorbed-flux IVW 0.846 ± 0.059 vs the inner 0.965 ± 0.044, fixed-effect outer/inner = 0.877 ± 0.072; all 23 fields including unmasked targets give 0.831 ± 0.045. Red team RT-03 (triaged): random effects give outer/inner = 0.94 ± 0.11 and leave-one-out 0.83–0.99 — the safe statement is that outer and inner agree within ~10–15%, and "the outer fields are fainter" is not robust. E023 is done: a joint inner+outer fit limits a large-core M31 halo at 20 kpc to a one-sided 95% UL of 0.46 (r_c=50) / 0.59 (r_c=100) / 0.90 (r_c=200) for β = 0.5 — the Zhang nominal median profile 0.83 is excluded up to r_c ≲ 125/175 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5); after red team RT-02, "for all r_c ≤ 200 at β = 0.6" is withdrawn (a 15% outer patchiness floor gives UL 0.90–1.06, so that end is marginal), and E023 will be redone in flux space on spectral surfaces; the EAGLE fiducial 0.51 up to r_c ≲ 45/65/85 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5/0.6). Red team RT-01 is triaged: E020's Model-C "−15%" is not an SP-shape systematic. Red team RT-06 (triaged): D49 stands as written — RASS excludes only a broad R45-bright excess, OMNI excludes only OMNI-traced high-flux SWCX, and the NW four's SP/QPB ratio is about 3× the other ten (a posteriori) — the NW excess is still "unexplained" but leans towards soft protons. A1d, E026 stage 1 and the new red teams RT-08/RT-09 are running, results Pending.

还有什么没解决？What is unsolved?

① 前景与 M31 谱形几乎相同，无法按距离分解——集中核（r_c ≤ 8 kpc）已被 E013 A2 v1 压到 0.047–0.164（见状态页；红队 RT-02 已分诊：该值对插值方式敏感 2.0–2.3 倍，收敛值待 A1d），大核（r_c ≥ 50 kpc）被 E023 首次限制（0.46–0.90 @20 kpc，β = 0.5；β = 0.6 大核端边际，「r_c ≤ 200 全部排除」已撤回）；② 外 NW 四场偏亮：E014 排除宽的 R45 亮天空结构与 OMNI 追踪的高通量太阳风；红队 RT-01 分诊后 NW 超出仍是「未解释」——固定 SP 谱形的说法不成立（等权重下模型 C 内 NW/其余仍 1.34），D49 原文生效（0.25 未解释场级系统误差），D49 更新（−15% SP 谱形系统误差）已撤回；红队 RT-06 后「未解释」倾向软质子（NW 四场 SP/QPB 约为其余十场 3×，事后 p ≈ 0.005–0.008）；③ v19 拟合 QA：模型 C（SP 谱形 + 线能量自由）只是敏感性变体——−15% 的 IVW 移动一半来自 v19 重收敛（A 步 −7.65%，A→B −5.29%，B→C −2.87%），且模型 C 的 SP 谱形未经物理验证（13/14 场 SP 升、MWhalo 降）；④ PSF 翼泄漏实测 0.16（原值）／0.33（零点校正）vs E016 模型 0.12——落在 E016 的 0.12–0.33 括号内（红队 RT-05：高括号 0.33，不写「0.28 保守」）；⑤ Locatelli 中心预言 1.29 > 0.965，但其参数范围 0.93–1.57 含 0.965 且 M31 在拟合所用 eRASS1 半球之外——写作「有条件紧张」，不写「高估」（红队 RT-04）；⑥ 300 kpc 图：外样本已扩到 26 个已拟合方向（23 个有双侧误差）（固定效应干净外/内 0.877 ± 0.072，随机效应 0.94 ± 0.11——稳妥说法「约 10–15% 内一致」），但全部在负银纬；12 个 P1 场与 10 个 P2 a+b 场的 v19 掩膜盖不住引文的展源圆（≤ 0.066），需 Virgo 重提取（E026，28 场，运行中，待定）。

(i) The foreground and M31 have nearly identical spectra, so distance separation fails — the compact core (r_c ≤ 8 kpc) is already pushed to 0.047–0.164 by E013 A2 v1 (see the state page; red team RT-02 is triaged: that value is interpolation-sensitive by 2.0–2.3×, the converged value awaits A1d), and the large core (r_c ≥ 50 kpc) is limited for the first time by E023 (0.46–0.90 at 20 kpc, β = 0.5; the β = 0.6 large-core end is marginal, "for all r_c ≤ 200" withdrawn); (ii) the bright outer-NW four: E014 excluded a broad R45-bright sky structure and OMNI-traced high-flux solar wind; after red team RT-01's triage the NW excess is still "unexplained" — the fixed-SP-shape explanation does not hold (with equal weights NW/other stays 1.34 even under Model C), D49 stands as written (the 0.25 unexplained field-level systematic), and the D49 update (a −15% SP-shape systematic) is withdrawn; after red team RT-06 "unexplained" leans towards soft protons (the NW four's SP/QPB is about 3× the other ten, a posteriori p ≈ 0.005–0.008); (iii) v19 fit QA: Model C (free SP shape and line energies) is only a sensitivity variant — half of the −15% IVW shift comes from re-converging the v19 fits (step A −7.65%, A→B −5.29%, B→C −2.87%), and Model C's SP shapes are not physically validated (SP up, MWhalo down in 13/14 fields); (iv) the PSF-wing leak is 0.16 (raw) / 0.33 (null-corrected) empirically vs E016's model 0.12 — inside E016's 0.12–0.33 bracket (red team RT-05: the high bracket is 0.33, not "0.28 conservative"); (v) Locatelli's central prediction 1.29 > 0.965, but its parameter range 0.93–1.57 contains 0.965 and M31 lies outside the eRASS1 half used for the fit — write "conditional tension", not "over-predicts" (red team RT-04); (vi) the 300-kpc map: the outer sample has grown to 26 fitted directions (23 with two-sided errors) (fixed-effect clean outer/inner 0.877 ± 0.072, random effects 0.94 ± 0.11 — the safe statement "agree within ~10–15%") but all at negative Galactic latitude; the v19 masks of the 12 P1 fields and 10 P2 a+b fields do not cover the cited extended-target circles (≤ 0.066), so they need Virgo re-extraction (E026, 28 fields, running, Pending).

下一步做什么？What do I do next?

按 编号计划：等 A1d（v19 模型多元起始曲面，运行中，ETA ~09:30Z）→ 在其上跑 A2 基线版（用 toy-MC 校准阈值，检查插值收敛：样条与线性一致到 10% 才引用收敛值）；在谱曲面上以流量空间重做 E023（加 MW 纬度项与外场系统项）；等 E026 的 28 场 Virgo 重提取 → 扩大后的内外样本联合拟合；红队 RT-08（A2 toy-MC 校准）与 RT-09（外样本选择）运行中。已完成：E013 A2 v1 + toy MC、A2 v2（敏感性变体）、E019、E020、E021、E022、E023、E017a、V01、E024、E025、A1c、RT-01…RT-07 分诊。命令见 byhand。

Follow the numbered plan: wait for A1d (the v19-model multi-start surfaces; running, ETA ~09:30Z) → run the A2 baseline on them (with a toy-MC-calibrated threshold, and an interpolation-convergence check: quote the converged UL only once spline and linear agree to 10%); redo E023 in flux space on spectral surfaces (with an MW latitude term and an outer systematic); wait for E026's 28-field Virgo re-extraction → the joint fit on the enlarged sample; red teams RT-08 (the A2 toy-MC calibration) and RT-09 (outer-sample selection) are running. Done: E013 A2 v1 + toy MC, A2 v2 (a sensitivity variant), E019, E020, E021, E022, E023, E017a, V01, E024, E025, A1c, and the RT-01…RT-07 triages. Commands at byhand.

最新骨架：流水线与各部分如何衔接Latest skeleton: the pipeline and how the parts connect

pipeline diagram
图：从 XMM 数据到 New-ANGELS III 论文的流水线。左：数据与前景输入；中：v19 逐 ObsID Sherpa 拟合；右：冻结的 CGMsum 测量与四条解释线（联合似然、NW 交叉检验、未解源、SP 谱形重拟合）。 Figure: the pipeline from XMM data to the New-ANGELS III paper. Left: data and foreground inputs; middle: the per-ObsID v19 Sherpa fit; right: the frozen CGMsum measurement and the four interpretation lines (joint likelihood, NW cross-check, unresolved sources, SP-shape refit).

来源：流程依据 cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md 与 background_spectrum_fitting_2T_basedon_obsid_v19.py 的模型结构；数值见 cognition-os/insights/I033。

Source: the flow follows cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md and the model structure of background_spectrum_fitting_2T_basedon_obsid_v19.py; numbers from cognition-os/insights/I033.

目标表（O1–O5）Objectives (O1–O5)

目标Objective 状态Status 当前最好数值（估计器已命名）Best current number (estimator named) 趋势Trend
O1 M31 内晕方向冷视线总和（CGMsum）的测量Total cool line-of-sight emission (CGMsum) toward the M31 inner halo done 14 场逆方差平均：吸收 0.5–2 keV 流量 0.965 ± 0.044；共温 kT = 0.17531 ± 0.00436 keV（v19，局部协方差误差）。红队 RT-04（已分诊）：该值是局部单起始基线——同模型多元起始（E020 步 A）把均值移到 0.891（−7.7%）；最终总量将来自 A1d 剖面曲面，模型 B/C 作拓扑系统误差；±0.044 只是统计误差14-field inverse-variance mean: absorbed 0.5–2 keV flux 0.965 ± 0.044; common kT = 0.17531 ± 0.00436 keV (v19, local-covariance errors). Red team RT-04 (triaged): that value is a local single-start baseline — same-model multi-start (E020 step A) moves the mean to 0.891 (−7.7%); the final total will come from the A1d profile surfaces with Models B/C as a topology systematic, and ±0.044 is statistical only →冻结（总量口径待 A1d）frozen (the total's definition awaits A1d)
O2a 由轮廓形状约束集中式 M31 热晕（小核）的大小/幅度Constrain the size/amplitude of a concentrated M31 hot halo (compact core) from the profile shape provisional 谱联合似然 E013 A2 v1（14 主场，插值版单侧 95% 上限，MW 常数，kT profile）：r_c = 4 kpc 时 β=0.4/0.5/0.6 给 0.132/0.080/0.052；r_c ≤ 8 kpc 整体 0.047–0.164。红队 RT-02（已分诊）：上限对插值方式敏感 2.0–2.3 倍（样条比线性松；r_c 4、β 0.5：样条 0.061、线性 0.027、修掉卡点后 0.044）——数值未收敛，收敛值待 A1d（在 A1d 上检查样条与线性一致到 10%）；Zhang 名义中值剖面 0.83 被排除 ≳4×（Zhang 自身 β 0.37 在 r_c 8 给 4.3×；RT-07：只排除名义中值剖面，不排除「叠加预期」——Zhang 只发布 16/84% 边际、无协方差；v19 APEC 桥给 0.76–0.90）。toy-MC 校准：覆盖率 0.975–0.984（略保守），观测上限落在 toy 中位数。敏感性变体 A2 v2（模型 C 曲面）：β = 0.5 时 r_c = 4/8/15/30 = 0.111/0.138/0.215/0.484；Zhang/上限（r_c ≤ 8）= 3.9–12 倍（β 0.4–0.6）；toy-MC 覆盖率 0.918–0.933（< 0.95，Δstat=2.71 略不保守，校准阈值待做——红队 RT-08（A2 toy-MC 校准）2026-10-16 06:18Z 报告已交，分诊待定）Spectral joint likelihood E013 A2 v1 (14 primary fields, interpolated one-sided 95% UL, MW constant, kT profiled): at r_c = 4 kpc, β=0.4/0.5/0.6 give 0.132/0.080/0.052; over r_c ≤ 8 kpc, 0.047–0.164. Red team RT-02 (triaged): the UL is interpolation-sensitive by 2.0–2.3× (spline looser than linear; r_c 4, β 0.5: spline 0.061, linear 0.027, 0.044 with the stuck point fixed) — not converged, the converged value awaits A1d (on A1d, check spline vs linear agreement to 10%); the Zhang nominal median profile 0.83 is excluded by ≳4× (Zhang's own β 0.37 gives 4.3× at r_c 8; RT-07: exclude the nominal median profile only, never "the stacked expectation" — Zhang publishes only 16/84 % marginals, no covariance; the v19 APEC bridge gives 0.76–0.90). Toy-MC calibration: coverage 0.975–0.984 (slightly conservative), the observed limits sit at the toy median. Sensitivity variant A2 v2 (Model-C surfaces): for β = 0.5 at r_c = 4/8/15/30 = 0.111/0.138/0.215/0.484; Zhang/UL for r_c ≤ 8 = 3.9–12x (β 0.4–0.6); toy-MC coverage 0.918–0.933 (< 0.95, the Δstat=2.71 rule slightly anti-conservative, a calibrated threshold is TODO — red team RT-08 (the A2 toy-MC calibration) filed its report at 2026-10-16 06:18Z, triage Pending) ↗
O2b 约束大核 M31 热晕（r_c ≥ 50 kpc，A2 够不到的区间）Constrain a large-core M31 hot halo (r_c ≥ 50 kpc, the regime A2 cannot reach) provisional E022（外场参考）+ E023（联合拟合，22 个 v19 norm，高斯似然）：β = 0.5 时 20 kpc 单侧 95% 上限 0.46（r_c=50）／0.59（r_c=100）／0.90（r_c=200）；内场单独拟合在 r_c ≥ 50 kpc 无约束力（r_c=100 时 3.61，r_c=200 时 13.8）。Zhang 名义中值 0.83 被排除到 r_c ≲ 125/175 kpc（β = 0.4/0.5）；红队 RT-02（已分诊）：「β = 0.6 时 r_c ≤ 200 全部排除」已撤回——15% 外场斑块底噪给 β = 0.6、r_c = 200 的上限 0.90–1.06，该端边际；E023 还因单一流量/norm 转换（外场跨度 1.40–3.22e-10）而将在流量空间于谱曲面上重做（加 MW 纬度项与外场系统项）。EAGLE fiducial 0.51 到 r_c ≲ 45/65/85 kpc（β = 0.4/0.5/0.6）。E022 的内禀 norm 外/内 = 0.80 ± 0.13（两组样本统计均匀），平 M31 项 ≲ 0.4–0.46（2σ，RT-03 后两种写法并列）。E025（D50 的 P1+P2）把外样本扩到 26 个已拟合方向（23 个有双侧误差）：固定效应干净外/内 = 0.877 ± 0.072；红队 RT-03（已分诊）：随机效应 0.94 ± 0.11，逐一剔除 0.83–0.99——稳妥说法「外场与内场在约 10–15% 内一致」，「外场更暗」不稳健E022 (the outer reference) + E023 (joint fit of the 22 v19 norms, Gaussian likelihood): for β = 0.5 the one-sided 95% UL at 20 kpc is 0.46 (r_c=50) / 0.59 (r_c=100) / 0.90 (r_c=200); inner-only fits are uninformative at r_c ≥ 50 kpc (3.61 at r_c=100, 13.8 at r_c=200). The Zhang nominal median 0.83 is excluded up to r_c ≲ 125/175 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5); red team RT-02 (triaged): "for all r_c ≤ 200 at β = 0.6" is withdrawn — a 15% outer patchiness floor gives a β = 0.6, r_c = 200 limit of 0.90–1.06, so that end is marginal; E023 is also to be redone in flux space on spectral surfaces (with an MW latitude term and an outer systematic) because of its single flux/norm conversion (the outer fields span 1.40–3.22e-10). The EAGLE fiducial 0.51 up to r_c ≲ 45/65/85 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5/0.6). E022's intrinsic norm outer/inner = 0.80 ± 0.13 (both samples statistically homogeneous), and a flat M31 term is ≲ 0.4–0.46 (2σ, both wordings after RT-03). E025 (D50's P1+P2) has grown the outer sample to 26 fitted directions (23 with two-sided errors): fixed-effect clean outer/inner = 0.877 ± 0.072; red team RT-03 (triaged): random effects 0.94 ± 0.11, leave-one-out 0.83–0.99 — the safe statement is "outer and inner agree within ~10–15%", and "the outer fields are fainter" is not robust ↗
O3 外 NW 亮场的起源Origin of the bright outer-NW fields E014 + E018a + E020 + RT-01 + RT-06 done 红队 RT-01 分诊（2026-10-15，Claude 复核全部 6 项）：E020 模型 C 的「NW 超出大半是固定 SP 谱形伪迹」不成立——−15% 的 IVW 移动中 v19 重收敛（A 步）贡献 −7.65%、SP 谱形（A→B）−5.29%、线能量（B→C）−2.87%；用共同的模型 C 误差时 NW/其余比值 1.345（v19）→ 1.133（A）→ 1.134（C）——下降发生在重收敛，不在 SP 谱形；等权重下 1.381 → 1.274（A）→ 1.341（C），模型 C 内 NW 超出仍在。I033 第 5 条回到 Questioned；D49 原文生效（0.25 未解释场级系统误差）；D49 更新撤回；模型 C 只是敏感性变体。红队 RT-06 分诊（2026-10-16，Claude 复算 4/4）：D49 原文的措辞收窄——RASS 只排除宽的 R45 亮超出（足迹稀释：28% 足迹内超出稀释到 1.09–1.14，观测 0.91 ± 0.12，≈1.8σ），不排除足迹尺度结构或弱映射进 R45 的谱；OMNI 只排除 OMNI 追踪的高通量 SWCX（日球层 SWCX 未检验）；NW 四场的 SP/QPB 比值约为其余十场的 3×（3.06×，事后 p ≈ 0.005–0.008）——「未解释」倾向软质子。E014（D49）：RASS 比值 0.91 ± 0.12 vs XMM 1.28；OMNI 无窗口超 4e8 cm⁻² s⁻¹；I034（ParetoGTICal 交叉核对）：v19 用 2.1.filter GTI，比 2.filter 更严，NW 四场没有被欠过滤——剩余耀斑时间不是解释；稳态 SP 对 GTI 不可见，E018b 预期变化不大Red team RT-01 triaged (2026-10-15, Claude reproduced all 6 checks): E020's claim that "the NW excess is mostly a fixed-SP-shape artefact" does not hold — of the −15% IVW shift, the v19 re-convergence (step A) gives −7.65%, the SP shape (A→B) −5.29%, the line energies (B→C) −2.87%; with common Model-C errors the NW/other ratio goes 1.345 (v19) → 1.133 (A) → 1.134 (C) — the drop happens at re-convergence, not at the SP shape; with equal weights 1.381 → 1.274 (A) → 1.341 (C), so the NW excess survives under Model C. I033 point 5 is back to Questioned; D49 stands as written (the 0.25 unexplained field-level systematic); the D49 update is withdrawn; Model C is a sensitivity variant only. Red team RT-06 triaged (2026-10-16, Claude reproduced 4/4): D49's wording is narrowed — RASS excludes only a broad R45-bright excess (footprint dilution: a 28% excess inside the footprints dilutes to 1.09–1.14 against the observed 0.91 ± 0.12, ≈1.8σ), not footprint-scale structure or a spectrum that maps weakly into R45; OMNI excludes only OMNI-traced high-flux SWCX (heliospheric SWCX is untested); the NW four's SP/QPB ratio is about 3× the other ten (3.06×, a posteriori p ≈ 0.005–0.008) — "unexplained" leans towards soft protons. E014 (D49): RASS ratio 0.91 ± 0.12 vs XMM 1.28; no OMNI window above 4e8 cm⁻² s⁻¹; I034 (the ParetoGTICal cross-check): v19 uses the 2.1.filter GTIs, stricter than 2.filter, and the NW four are not under-filtered — residual flare time is not the explanation; a steady SP floor is invisible to GTIs, so E018b is expected to change little ↗
O4 银河系前景模型 + Local Hot Bridge 检验（300 kpc 图）MW foreground model + Local Hot Bridge test (300-kpc map) E021/E022/E023/E024/E025 完成；E026 运行中E021/E022/E023/E024/E025 done; E026 running E021 清点 + E022（8 个 class-A 外场拟合）之后，D50（PI，2026-10-15「同意第二个」）采纳 E024 建议：P1+P2 立即拟合（E025），6 个真正外围场上 Virgo 重提取，跳过 P4，弃 NGC 147（仅剩 22% 视场）。E025 结果：P1 12/12 未通过掩膜审计（现有 v19 谱的掩膜只盖住引文展源圆的 0–9%），全部转入重提取清单；P2 19 场拟了 18 个（1 个 dof=0 剔除），其中 3 个无有限通量误差。干净外样本（13 场，无未掩展源）IVW 0.846 ± 0.059（χ² 27.3/12）vs 内场 0.965 ± 0.044，固定效应外/内 = 0.877 ± 0.072；全部 23 场（含未掩展源）0.831 ± 0.045；与 b（ρ = 0.04/−0.10）、N_H（ρ = −0.13/−0.19）均无相关；未掩展源不抬高流量（b-only 0.865 ± 0.133 vs a+b 0.809 ± 0.069）。红队 RT-03（已分诊）：干净 IVW 有 27% 权重集中在一个场（0884992601）且过度离散（χ²/dof 2.27）——随机效应外/内 = 0.94 ± 0.11（全部 23 场 0.89 ± 0.08），逐一剔除 0.83–0.99；稳妥说法是「外场与内场在约 10–15% 内一致」，「外场更暗」不稳健；误差模型敏感（按剖面半宽重加权把 E022 均值移到 0.897，占干净差距的 46%）。correction 1：10 个 P2 a+b 场也未通过掩膜审计（MOS 最低 0–0.066）→ 重提取清单 = 6（D50）+ 12（P1）+ 10（a+b）= 28 场（E026，运行中，待定）。全部新增方向仍在 b < 0（−33.2 … −9.6），无正纬度覆盖。Locatelli 模型在 M31 足迹投影 1.290 vs 测量 0.965（残差 −0.326，有条件紧张——其参数范围 0.93–1.57 含 0.965，且 M31 在拟合所用 eRASS1 半球之外，红队 RT-04）；Ueda 0.312、HaloSat 0.565After the E021 inventory and E022 (8 class-A outer fields fitted), D50 (the PI, 2026-10-15, "agree with the second") adopts E024's suggestion: fit P1+P2 now (E025), re-extract 6 genuinely-outer fields on Virgo, skip P4, drop NGC 147 (only 22% of the field of view left). E025 results: all 12 P1 fields fail the mask audit (the existing v19 spectra's mask covers only 0–9% of the cited extended-target circle), all moving to the re-extraction list; 18 of 19 attempted P2 fits are accepted (1 rejected, dof = 0), 3 of them without a finite flux error. The clean outer sample (13 fields without an unmasked extended target) has IVW 0.846 ± 0.059 (χ² 27.3/12) vs the inner 0.965 ± 0.044, fixed-effect outer/inner = 0.877 ± 0.072; all 23 fields (including unmasked targets) give 0.831 ± 0.045; no trend with b (ρ = 0.04/−0.10) or N_H (ρ = −0.13/−0.19); unmasked extended targets do not raise the flux (b-only 0.865 ± 0.133 vs a+b 0.809 ± 0.069). Red team RT-03 (triaged): the clean IVW mean carries 27% of its weight in one field (0884992601) and is overdispersed (χ²/dof 2.27) — random effects give outer/inner = 0.94 ± 0.11 (all 23 fields 0.89 ± 0.08), leave-one-out 0.83–0.99; the safe statement is "outer and inner agree within ~10–15%", and "the outer fields are fainter" is not robust; the error model matters (reweighting by profile half-widths moves E022's mean to 0.897, 46% of the clean gap). Correction 1: the 10 P2 a+b fields also fail the mask audit (MOS minimum 0–0.066) → the re-extraction list = 6 (D50) + 12 (P1) + 10 (a+b) = 28 fields (E026, running, Pending). All added directions remain at b < 0 (−33.2 … −9.6); no positive-latitude coverage. The Locatelli model projected at the M31 footprint is 1.290 vs the measured 0.965 (residual −0.326, conditional tension — its parameter range 0.93–1.57 contains 0.965, and M31 lies outside the eRASS1 half used for the fit, red team RT-04); Ueda 0.312, HaloSat 0.565 ↗
O5 New-ANGELS III 论文The New-ANGELS III manuscript draft 16 页内部稿完成（AASTeX，5 表 3 图）；提交门槛见 I013（径向+侧向联合似然、边界感知区间、系统误差网格等）A 16-page internal draft exists (AASTeX, 5 tables, 3 figures); submission gates in I013 (shared radial-plus-side likelihood, boundary-aware intervals, the systematic grid, ...) ↗

来源：O1 cognition-os/insights/I012 与 I033；O2a cognition-os/experiments/E013（A2 v1、toy-MC 与「A2 v2 final」节；插值表 a2_ul_vs_rc_interp.csv 与 a2_ul_vs_rc_interp_v2C.csv、覆盖率 a2_toymc_threshold.csv 与 a2_toymc_threshold_v2C.csv）、cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md（RT-02 的 F3 发现）、.agent/LOOP_STATE.md（A1d 行）；O2b cognition-os/experiments/E022（correction 1 节）、E023（limits.csv）与 E025（correction 1 节；correction1_ivw_table.csv）；O3 cognition-os/experiments/E020（「Red-team RT-01 triage」节）、E014、cognition-os/insights/I034、cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D49 及其 update 节（撤回）、cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md；O4 cognition-os/experiments/E021（inventory.csv）、E024（policy_table.csv）、E025、cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D50、newangels3_discussion/E024_hermes/latitude_reach.csv、00_AI_BRIEFING.md（D42–D46 数值）与 02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md；O5 cognition-os/insights/I013 与 paper_apj_v19_cgmsum_draft/README_draft_status_and_submission_gaps.md。

Source: O1 cognition-os/insights/I012 and I033; O2a cognition-os/experiments/E013 (the A2 v1, toy-MC and "A2 v2 final" sections; the interpolated tables a2_ul_vs_rc_interp.csv and a2_ul_vs_rc_interp_v2C.csv, the coverage a2_toymc_threshold.csv and a2_toymc_threshold_v2C.csv), cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md (RT-02's F3 finding), .agent/LOOP_STATE.md (the A1d row); O2b cognition-os/experiments/E022 (the correction-1 section), E023 (limits.csv) and E025 (the correction-1 section; correction1_ivw_table.csv); O3 cognition-os/experiments/E020 (the "Red-team RT-01 triage" section), E014, cognition-os/insights/I034, cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D49 with its update section (withdrawn), cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md; O4 cognition-os/experiments/E021 (inventory.csv), E024 (policy_table.csv), E025, cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D50, newangels3_discussion/E024_hermes/latitude_reach.csv, 00_AI_BRIEFING.md (D42–D46 numbers) and 02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md; O5 cognition-os/insights/I013 and paper_apj_v19_cgmsum_draft/README_draft_status_and_submission_gaps.md.

未解问题表Open problems

问题Problem 为什么重要Why it matters 当前最佳假设Best current hypothesis 下一个检验Next test 负责Owner 状态Status
MW 与 M31 气体同温同形，EPIC 谱无法按距离分解（I006）MW and M31 gas share temperature and spectral shape; EPIC spectra cannot separate them by distance (I006) 决定论文能声明什么：只能测总和 CGMsum，任何分量归属都需要外部假设Determines what the paper can claim: only the sum CGMsum is measured; any component split needs external assumptions 分离只能来自空间形状（半径衰减、南北对称）与外部前景约束Separation can only come from spatial shape (radial decline, N/S symmetry) and external foreground constraints E013 A2 v1 已给出谱级上限（见状态页插值表；红队 RT-02 已分诊——上限对插值方式敏感 2.0–2.3 倍，收敛值待 A1d）；A2 基线版将在 A1d（v19 模型多元起始曲面，运行中）上重跑E013 A2 v1 has delivered the spectral-level limit (see the interpolated table on the state page; red team RT-02 triaged — the UL is interpolation-sensitive by 2.0–2.3×, the converged value awaits A1d); the A2 baseline will rerun on A1d (v19-model multi-start surfaces, running) E013 A1d/A2 基线运行中；RT-02 已分诊A1d/A2 baseline running; RT-02 triaged
轮廓平（χ²=11.99/13；E020 模型 C 下同样平，斜率 −0.0005 ± 0.006 /kpc）：M31 集中晕（r_c ≤ 8 kpc）在 20 kpc ≤0.047–0.164（A2 v1 插值版），远低于 Zhang 名义中值剖面 0.83The profile is flat (χ²=11.99/13; still flat under E020's Model C, slope −0.0005 ± 0.006 /kpc): a concentrated M31 halo (r_c ≤ 8 kpc) is ≤0.047–0.164 at 20 kpc (A2 v1, interpolated), far below the Zhang nominal median profile 0.83 M31 内晕热气要么比 Zhang 名义中值剖面暗几倍，要么在 10–30 kpc 内分布很平（核 ≳30 kpc）M31's inner-halo hot gas is either several times fainter than the Zhang nominal median profile, or flat over 10–30 kpc (core ≳30 kpc) 「平/大核」这条退路现在也被限制：E023 用 8 个 82–253 kpc 外场把大核晕压到 0.46（r_c=50）／0.59（r_c=100）／0.90（r_c=200）@20 kpc（β=0.5），Zhang 名义中值 0.83 被排除到 r_c ≲ 125/175 kpc（β = 0.4/0.5）；「β = 0.6 时 r_c ≤ 200 全部排除」已被红队 RT-02 撤回（15% 外场斑块底噪给 β = 0.6、r_c = 200 的上限 0.90–1.06，该端边际）；E025 再把外样本扩到 26 个已拟合方向（23 个有双侧误差）（干净外/内 0.877 ± 0.072；RT-03 后稳妥说法是「约 10–15% 内一致」）；r_c = 50 时上限 0.318–0.601（A2 v1，内场单独）已被联合拟合取代the "flat/large-core" escape route is now limited too: using the 8 outer fields at 82–253 kpc, E023 pushes the large-core halo to 0.46 (r_c=50) / 0.59 (r_c=100) / 0.90 (r_c=200) at 20 kpc (β=0.5), excluding the Zhang nominal median 0.83 up to r_c ≲ 125/175 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5); "for all r_c ≤ 200 at β = 0.6" was withdrawn by red team RT-02 (a 15% outer patchiness floor gives a β = 0.6, r_c = 200 limit of 0.90–1.06, so that end is marginal); E025 has since grown the outer sample to 26 fitted directions (23 with two-sided errors) (clean outer/inner 0.877 ± 0.072; after RT-03 the safe wording is "agree within ~10–15%"); the A2 v1 inner-only limit at r_c = 50 (0.318–0.601) is superseded by the joint fit A2 基线版（A1d 曲面）复核集中核上限；E023 在谱曲面上重做大核上限（加 MW 纬度项）；E016 的未解源项空间上平，不削弱形状上限the A2 baseline (on the A1d surfaces) re-checks the compact-core limit; E023 is redone on spectral surfaces for the large-core limit (with an MW latitude term); E016's unresolved-source terms are spatially flat, so they do not weaken the shape limit E013 provisional
外 NW 四场偏亮（v19 外四/其余十 = 1.28）The four outer-NW fields are bright (v19 outer-four/other-ten = 1.28) 若为银河系纬度结构，会挤占 M31 的解释空间；若为 SWCX 则是时间效应；若为仪器/软质子则影响系统误差预算If it is Galactic-latitude structure it eats into the M31 budget; if SWCX it is a time effect; if instrumental/soft-proton it changes the systematic budget 红队 RT-01 分诊后回到「未解释」：−15% 的 IVW 移动一半来自 v19 重收敛（0800730301 通量 0.975 → 0.559，Δstat 仅 −0.04），固定 SP 谱形只贡献 −5.29%；用共同模型 C 误差时 NW/其余 1.345 → 1.133（A）→ 1.134（C）——下降在重收敛，不在 SP 谱形；等权重下模型 C 内仍 1.34。E014 已排除大尺度天空（RASS 0.91 ± 0.12 vs XMM 1.28）与 OMNI 太阳风；I034：NW 四场没有被 GTI 欠过滤（2.1.filter 比 2.filter 严，NW 四场仅损失 0–28% 时间），稳态 SP 对时间筛选不可见。D49 原文生效（0.25 未解释场级系统误差）；D49 更新（−15% SP 谱形系统误差）已撤回；模型 C 只是敏感性变体back to "unexplained" after red team RT-01's triage: half of the −15% IVW shift comes from re-converging the v19 fits (0800730301's flux 0.975 → 0.559 at Δstat only −0.04), the fixed SP shape contributes just −5.29%; with common Model-C errors NW/other goes 1.345 → 1.133 (A) → 1.134 (C) — the drop is at re-convergence, not the SP shape; with equal weights it stays 1.34 under Model C. E014 excluded large-scale sky (RASS 0.91 ± 0.12 vs XMM 1.28) and OMNI solar wind; I034: the NW four are not under-filtered by the GTIs (2.1.filter is stricter than 2.filter; the NW four lose only 0–28% of live time), and a steady SP floor is invisible to time filtering. D49 stands as written (the 0.25 unexplained field-level systematic); the D49 update (a −15% SP-shape systematic) is withdrawn; Model C is a sensitivity variant only A1d 曲面重跑 A2 基线；红队 RT-02/RT-03 分诊；E018b（Virgo 更严耀斑过滤）预期变化不大（I034），保持可选rerun the A2 baseline on the A1d surfaces; triage red teams RT-02/RT-03; E018b (a stricter Virgo flare filter) is expected to change little (I034) and stays optional E020/RT-01/PI 回到未解释；红队进行中back to unexplained; red team running
v19 拟合 QA：SP 谱形过刚、仪器线能量钉边（E018a/E013）——E020 已量化v19 fit QA: the SP shape was too rigid and line energies pinned (E018a/E013) — now quantified by E020 决定系统误差网格里必须有哪一行（I013 提交门槛 3）；不修会以场级伪迹污染科学结论Decides which row the systematic grid must contain (I013 submission gate 3); unfixed, it contaminates science with field-level artefacts E020（20 场，多元起始）：SP 谱形自由在 0401/0501/0901/1101/2101 改善 8–16；线能量自由在 0401 改善 8.5、1001 改善 15。模型 C 下 14 场逆方差均值 0.964 → 0.819 ± 0.041。红队 RT-01 分解：−15.04% 中重收敛（A）−7.65%、SP 谱形（A→B）−5.29%、线能量（B→C）−2.87%——不是一个 SP 谱形系统误差；模型 C 的 SP 谱形未经物理验证（13/14 场 SP 升、MWhalo 降，log-ratio 相关 −0.49；0800730901 的 SP ×1150 且 PhoIndx2 钉在极限）。模型 C 的剖面误差在固定 kT 下算得（低估），4 场半宽仅 0.15–0.27 σ_v19；残差散布 χ² 24.5/13（p = 0.026），单个 −15% 标量不能替代场级项E020 (20 fields, multi-start): freeing the SP shape improves 0401/0501/0901/1101/2101 by 8–16; freeing line energies improves 0401 by 8.5 and 1001 by 15. Under Model C the 14-field inverse-variance mean is 0.964 → 0.819 ± 0.041. Red team RT-01's decomposition: of −15.04%, re-convergence (A) gives −7.65%, the SP shape (A→B) −5.29%, the line energies (B→C) −2.87% — not a single SP-shape systematic; Model C's SP shapes are not physically validated (SP up, MWhalo down in 13/14 fields, log-ratio correlation −0.49; 0800730901's SP ×1150 with PhoIndx2 at its limit). Model C's profile errors were computed at fixed kT (an underestimate); 4 fields have half-widths only 0.15–0.27 σ_v19; the residual scatter is χ² 24.5/13 (p = 0.026), so a single −15% scalar cannot replace the field-to-field term A1d（v19 模型、每点多元起始）曲面成为 A2 基线（运行中）；模型 C 曲面（A1c）降级为敏感性变体；D49 更新撤回——系统误差预算继续携带场级未解释项the A1d (v19-model, multi-start at every point) surfaces become the A2 baseline (running); the Model-C surfaces (A1c) are demoted to a sensitivity variant; the D49 update is withdrawn — the systematic budget keeps carrying the unexplained field-level term E020 E020 完成E020 done
PSF 翼泄漏：掩膜亮源的翼落在提取区里（E016）PSF-wing leak: the wings of masked bright sources fall inside the extraction region (E016) E016 里它是最大的单一未解源项（模型估计 ≈0.12 F [最大 0.32]，主要是幂律）；若实测偏大，会压低「仅气体」的总和并改变系统误差预算In E016 it is the single largest unresolved-source term (model estimate ≈0.12 F [max 0.32], mostly power law); if the empirical value is larger it lowers the gas-only total and changes the systematic budget E019（已完成）：123 个源相机测量里的 81 个孤立类点源叠加——只有最亮 bin（中位 1.2e-14 cgs）可用：f_leak = 10.3 ± 8.6%（原值）／20.4 ± 7.8%（零点校正）；King 模型对同样椭圆给 14.3%。14 主场的逐场泄漏 SB：0.16（原值）／0.33（零点校正） vs E016 模型 0.12（高括号 0.22）；共享标度误差 ≈ ±0.14。泄漏是幂律型、空间上平——不改变 M31 形状上限；对总量是又一个向下项（主要落在幂律/CXB 项，不在 APEC）E019 (done): a stack of 81 isolated point-like sources out of 123 source-camera measurements — only the brightest bin (median 1.2e-14 cgs) is usable: f_leak = 10.3 ± 8.6% raw / 20.4 ± 7.8% null-corrected; the King model gives 14.3% for the same ellipses. Per-field leak SB over the 14 primaries: 0.16 raw / 0.33 null-corrected vs E016's model 0.12 (high bracket 0.22); the shared-scale error is ≈ ±0.14. The leak is power-law-like and spatially flat — it does not change the M31 shape limit; for the total it is one more downward term (mostly in the power-law/CXB term, not the APEC) 暗 bin 低于零点底噪（椭圆外净计数为负），不可用；2801（E016 异常掩膜标记）在 1.06 > F，0101 在 0.50 ≈ Fthe faint bins sit below the background floor (net counts out of the ellipse are negative), unusable; 2801 (an anomalous mask, E016 flag) is at 1.06 > F and 0101 at 0.50 ≈ F E019 E019 完成E019 done
Locatelli MW 模型在 M31 方向预言 1.29 > 测量 0.965The Locatelli MW model predicts 1.29 > the measured 0.965 toward M31 若模型对，则无正的 M31 中心残差；紧张来自模型、转换或吸收之一If the model is right there is no non-negative central M31 residual; the tension lies in the model, the conversion, or absorption 模型高估、线-宽带转换失配、或 v19 总和偏低（三种解释并列）Model over-prediction, line-to-band conversion mismatch, or a low-biased v19 sum (three live explanations) 300 kpc RASS 图建立本地 MW 模型（O4）A 300-kpc RASS map to build a local MW model (O4) 计划planned 计划planned
300 kpc 图：30 kpc 以外的档案样本很薄（E021）The 300-kpc map: the archival sample beyond 30 kpc is thin (E021) O4（本地 MW 模型 + Local Hot Bridge 检验）需要 30 kpc 以外的视线；样本太薄会限制图的能力O4 (a local MW model + the Local Hot Bridge test) needs sightlines beyond 30 kpc; a thin sample limits what the map can do 145 个 ObsID 里 class-A 只有 22 个，30 kpc 以外仅 8 个（30–60 kpc 为零）；全部在 b = −5° 到 −33°，无正纬度场。E022 已完成这 8 个场的拟合（外 IVW 0.842 ± 0.065；内禀 norm 外/内 0.80 ± 0.13）。D50 已定（2026-10-15）：P1+P2 立即拟合、6 场 Virgo 重提取、跳过 P4、弃 NGC 147。E025 已跑：P1 12/12 掩膜审计未过（掩膜仅盖展源圆 0–9%）→ 全部转重提取；P2 18/19 接受；干净外样本（13 场）0.846 ± 0.059，外/内 0.877 ± 0.072；与 b、N_H 无相关。correction 1 后重提取清单 = 6 + 12 + 10 = 28 场（E026 运行中，待定）；4 个引文半径是估值，任何提升结果前需从图像重推Of 145 ObsIDs only 22 are class A, and just 8 lie beyond 30 kpc (zero at 30–60 kpc); all at b = −5° to −33°, no positive-latitude field. E022 has fitted those 8 fields (outer IVW 0.842 ± 0.065; intrinsic norm outer/inner 0.80 ± 0.13). D50 is decided (2026-10-15): fit P1+P2 now, re-extract 6 fields on Virgo, skip P4, drop NGC 147. E025 has run: all 12 P1 fields fail the mask audit (the mask covers only 0–9% of the extended-target circle) → all move to re-extraction; 18/19 P2 fits accepted; the clean outer sample (13 fields) gives 0.846 ± 0.059, outer/inner 0.877 ± 0.072; no trend with b or N_H. After correction 1 the re-extraction list = 6 + 12 + 10 = 28 fields (E026 running, Pending); 4 cited radii are estimates, to be re-derived from images before any promoted result E026（28 场 Virgo 重提取，D50 条件：复现 v19 的 2.1.filter GTI 约定并逐相机报告相对 2.filter 的保留时间）→ 重提取场按 v19 规则拟合 → 在扩大样本上重做 E023 式联合拟合（加 MW 纬度项）；红队 RT-03 审查外/内比较E026 (28-field Virgo re-extraction, D50 conditions: reproduce the v19 2.1.filter GTI convention and report retained time vs 2.filter per camera) → the re-extracted fields are fitted under v19 rules → the E023-style joint fit is redone on the enlarged sample (with an MW latitude term); red team RT-03 reviews the outer/inner comparison E026/RT-03 E021/E022/E024/E025 完成；E026 运行中E021/E022/E024/E025 done; E026 running
源掩膜的出处缺口（I013 提交门槛 5）：v19 掩膜规则不可复原（经验上是 2–4.5 keV 硬带掩膜）The source-mask provenance gap (I013 submission gate 5): the v19 mask rule is unrecoverable (empirically a hard-band 2–4.5 keV mask) 审稿人会问「掩膜怎么来的、漏了多少」；E017a 现在给出实测答案a referee will ask "where did the mask come from and what does it miss"; E017a now answers it empirically E017a（已完成）：v19 掩膜按 0.5–2 keV 流量掩住 Paper I 亮源（>1e-14）的 95.5 %（233/244；11 个未掩，6 个主场亮源完备度低于 0.95）；未掩亮源量级 ≈ 11 × ~2e-14 摊在 ≈ 4200 arcmin² ≈ 0.05（1e-15 单位，多为幂律/CXB 型，小的向上偏置）。掩膜椭圆 8784 个里 87 % 没有 10″ 内的 Paper I 源——v19 掩膜来自更深的逐观测探测表（E016：有效 ML ≈ 0.55），切掉更多（多为暗源/伪源），花的是天空面积不是偏差E017a (done): by 0.5–2 keV flux the v19 mask covers 95.5 % of the bright Paper I sources (>1e-14; 233/244; 11 unmasked, 6 primary fields below 0.95 bright completeness); the unmasked-bright order of magnitude is ≈ 11 × ~2e-14 spread over ≈ 4200 arcmin² ≈ 0.05 (1e-15 units, mostly power-law/CXB-like, a small upward bias). Of the 8784 mask ellipses, 87 % have no Paper I source within 10″ — the v19 mask comes from a much deeper per-observation detection list (E016: effective ML ≈ 0.55), so it cuts many more (mostly faint or spurious) regions; it costs sky area, not bias E017b（低优先，除非审稿人要）：只用 Paper I 星表重建掩膜（需 Virgo 重提取），对比 v19 的 skyarea 与通量E017b (low priority unless a referee asks): rebuild the mask from the Paper I catalogue only (needs re-extraction on Virgo), compare skyarea and flux with v19 E017a E017a 完成E017a done
时间过滤（GTI）与场间底噪：v19 的 GTI 是历史 2.1.filter，场间散布的来源是什么？（I034）Time filtering (GTIs) and the between-field floor: v19's GTIs are the historical 2.1.filter — what causes the field-to-field scatter? (I034) 若散布是残余耀斑，更严的 GTI 能压低它（E018b）；若是稳态 SP/未遮光的 QPB，GTI 无效，系统误差要靠场级模型项携带if the scatter were residual flares, a stricter GTI would suppress it (E018b); if it is a steady SP or unvignetted QPB, GTIs are powerless and the systematic must ride as a field-level model term I034（ParetoGTICal 交叉核对）：v19 的诊断产品与 2.1.filter 逐字节一致（sha256 核对三个场）；对全部 14 主场 2.1.filter 保留的时间少于 2.filter（更严）；NW 四场损失 0–28%，而 1101/2301/2801 损失 17–25% 却不亮——残余耀斑不是 NW 超出的解释；稳态 SP 对 GTI 不可见；ParetoGTICal E020 给出同 z 处 9–12% 的场间 rms 底噪（未遮光 QPB/SP 之差），与谱拟合的场间散布同量级I034 (the ParetoGTICal cross-check): v19's diagnostic products are byte-identical to 2.1.filter (sha256-checked on three fields); on all 14 primaries 2.1.filter keeps less time than 2.filter (stricter); the NW four lose 0–28% while 1101/2301/2801 lose 17–25% without being bright — residual flares do not explain the NW excess; a steady SP floor is invisible to GTIs; ParetoGTICal E020 gives a 9–12% rms between-field floor at the same z (unvignetted QPB/SP differences), the same scale as the spectral fits' field-to-field scatter E018b 预期变化不大（保持可选）；E027 的谱级 stage 1（31 个观测 × 泳道）用预注册的 S1–S4 指标直接回答「GTI 分支有多大」——RT-04-T1（2.filter 分支测试）已并入；D50 的 Virgo 重提取必须复现 2.1.filter 约定并报告相对 2.filter 的保留时间；系统误差预算继续携带场级项E018b is expected to change little (stays optional); E027's spectral stage 1 (31 observations × lanes) answers "how big is the GTI branch" directly with the pre-registered S1–S4 metrics — RT-04-T1 (the 2.filter branch test) is merged into it; D50's Virgo re-extractions must reproduce the 2.1.filter convention and report retained time vs 2.filter; the systematic budget keeps the field-level term I034/E027 I034 完成I034 done
GTI 政策（ParetoGTICal 的 2.filter/FLR_z3/MS_z3.5_core/GATE）能为我们保留多少有价值时间、降低多少误差？（E027，PI 2026-10-16）How much valuable time do the GTI policies (ParetoGTICal's 2.filter/FLR_z3/MS_z3.5_core/GATE) keep for us, and how much error do they reduce? (E027, the PI, 2026-10-16) v19 用历史 2.1.filter；若别的策略能在同一样本上给出更小的谱误差，或把更多观测变成可用场，样本与系统误差预算都会变；同时要给 ParetoGTI 的标准设计反馈v19 uses the historical 2.1.filter; if another policy gives smaller spectral errors on the same sample, or turns more observations into usable fields, both the sample and the systematic budget change; and ParetoGTI's criterion design needs the feedback Stage 0/0b（灯光曲线级，已完成）：GATE 不可用（丢 5–6 个主场，含 NW 四场中的 2–3 个，与 ParetoGTICal 不采用它一致）；FLR_z3 与 MS_z3.5_core 清洗效果相同（NW 四场总水平约 −2%、其余约 −0.5%），代价不同（MS 损失 2–3% 曝光，FLR 约 10%）；对 NW 超出的预期效应小（NW−其他差变 −1.4 至 −2.3% 的总水平，最多约 CGMsum 中 ~25% NW 超出的四分之一）；场间 rms 无改善。Stage 0b（31 个观测）：总量掩盖再分配——各策略保留总量相近（none 的 0.61–0.65）但落在不同观测上，主要价值是覆盖（可能把多达约 11 个非 v19 指向变成可用场，MOS2 MS_z3.5_core 在其上约 64 ks）。谱级结论待定——stage 1 的 S1–S4 指标已预注册Stage 0/0b (light-curve level, done): GATE is unusable (it drops 5–6 primaries, including 2–3 of the NW four, agreeing with ParetoGTICal not adopting it); FLR_z3 and MS_z3.5_core clean identically (about −2% on the NW four's gross level, about −0.5% on the others) at different cost (MS costs 2–3% of the exposure, FLR_z3 about 10%); the expected effect on the NW excess is small (the NW−other difference moves by −1.4 to −2.3% of the gross level, at most about a quarter of CGMsum's ~25% NW excess); no improvement in the between-field rms. Stage 0b (31 observations): totals hide the redistribution — the policies keep similar totals (0.61–0.65 of none) but on different observations, so the main value is coverage (up to ~11 non-v19 pointings may become usable fields; MOS2 MS_z3.5_core gives ≈64 ks on them). The spectral verdict is Pending — stage 1's S1–S4 metrics are pre-registered E027 stage 1：1a GTI 导出（lang，已派发 06:26Z）→ 1b Virgo 逐观测逐泳道提取（须等 ssh 恢复与 E026 试点通过）→ 1c lang 拟合 → 1d 反馈备忘录 FEEDBACK_ParetoGTI.md。RT-04-T1（2.filter GTI 分支测试）已并入 stage 1E027 stage 1: 1a GTI export (lang, dispatched 06:26Z) → 1b per-observation per-lane extraction on Virgo (waits for ssh's return and E026's pilot passing) → 1c fits on lang → 1d the feedback memo FEEDBACK_ParetoGTI.md. RT-04-T1 (the 2.filter GTI-branch test) is merged into stage 1 E027 stage 0/0b 完成；stage 1 运行中stages 0/0b done; stage 1 running
南北差异 0.212 ± 0.210（1.01σ）——一致性，不是非对称探测North-minus-South 0.212 ± 0.210 (1.01σ) — consistency, not an asymmetry detection 非对称上限是论文的直接结果之一；两侧半径分布不匹配（中位 19.28 vs 14.97 kpc）The asymmetry limit is one of the paper's direct results; the two sides have unmatched radius distributions (medians 19.28 vs 14.97 kpc) 总和在两侧一致；任何分量级非对称结论都需要 MW 均匀或 M31 对称假设The sum is consistent between sides; any component-level asymmetry claim needs MW-uniformity or M31-symmetry assumptions 共享径向项 + 侧向偏移的联合拟合（I013 提交门槛 1）A joint fit with a shared radial term plus a side offset (I013 submission gate 1) 计划planned 计划planned

来源：cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md（2026-10-14 D48 块）；cognition-os/insights/I033（E022 + E023 段；第 5 条经 RT-01 回到 Questioned）、I006、I012、I017、I034；cognition-os/experiments/E013（A2 v1、toy-MC 与「A2 v2 final」节）、E014、E016、E018a、E019、E020（「Red-team RT-01 triage」节）、E021、E022（correction 1 节）、E023、E024、E025（correction 1 节）、E017a；cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D49 及其 update 节（撤回）与 D50；cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md（RT-02 的 F3 发现）；.agent/LOOP_STATE.md（A1d/RT-02/RT-03/E026 运行与队列）；03_TRUST_TABLE.md 末行。

Source: cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md (2026-10-14 D48 block); cognition-os/insights/I033 (the E022 + E023 paragraph; point 5 back to Questioned after RT-01), I006, I012, I017, I034; cognition-os/experiments/E013 (the A2 v1, toy-MC and "A2 v2 final" sections), E014, E016, E018a, E019, E020 (the "Red-team RT-01 triage" section), E021, E022 (the correction-1 section), E023, E024, E025 (the correction-1 section), E017a; cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D49 with its update section (withdrawn) and D50; cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md (RT-02's F3 finding); .agent/LOOP_STATE.md (the A1d/RT-02/RT-03/E026 runs and the queue); the last rows of 03_TRUST_TABLE.md.

未来 1–4 周计划（依据 D48 与 02_CURRENT_QUESTION）Plan for the next 1–4 weeks (from D48 and 02_CURRENT_QUESTION)

E018a fluxes
图：E018a 的八个场（左：外 NW 四场；右：同期对照四场）的吸收 0.5–2 keV CGMsum 通量。黑点 = 冻结的 v19；蓝方 = 模型 A（v19 重收敛，6 个起始）；红菱 = 模型 B（A + SP 谱形自由）。0301 的流量在近简并处移动（0.975→0.56，Δstat −0.04），0601 在线能量解钉后统计量降 14.7；外四/对照四的逆方差比值从 1.295 降到 1.130（≈1σ）。 Figure: E018a's absorbed 0.5–2 keV CGMsum fluxes for the eight fields (left: the outer-NW four; right: the same-epoch control four). Black = frozen v19; blue squares = Model A (v19 re-converged, 6 starts); red diamonds = Model B (A + free SP shape). 0301's flux moves at a near-degeneracy (0.975→0.56 at Δstat −0.04), and 0601's statistic drops by 14.7 once the line energy unpins; the outer-four/control-four inverse-variance ratio falls from 1.295 to 1.130 (≈1σ).

数据：newangels3_discussion/E018a_luna/fits_per_field.csv（E018a，luna，Claude 已核）；比值 1.295/1.168/1.130 由本站用 v19 权重从该 CSV 复算。图由 handbook/hermes_figscripts/make_fig_e018a.py 生成。

Data: newangels3_discussion/E018a_luna/fits_per_field.csv (E018a, luna, Claude-checked); the 1.295/1.168/1.130 ratios recomputed by this site from that CSV with v19 weights. Figure made by handbook/hermes_figscripts/make_fig_e018a.py.

E021 sky coverage
图：E021 档案清点的天区覆盖（Claude 评审时已查看）。lang 的 data/ 有 145 个 ObsID：class-A（v19 可用）22 个、class-B 114 个、class-C 9 个。class-A 按到 M31 的距离：0–30 kpc 14 个（New-ANGELS 核心样本）、30–60 kpc 0 个、60–100 kpc 3 个、100–150 kpc 1 个、150–200 kpc 3 个、200–300 kpc 1 个——30 kpc 以外只有 8 个，且全部在负银纬。 Figure: the sky coverage of E021's archival inventory (viewed by the reviewer). lang's data/ holds 145 ObsIDs: 22 class A (v19-ready), 114 class B, 9 class C. Class A by distance from M31: 14 at 0–30 kpc (the New-ANGELS core), 0 at 30–60 kpc, 3 at 60–100, 1 at 100–150, 3 at 150–200, 1 at 200–300 — only 8 beyond 30 kpc, all at negative Galactic latitude.

数据：newangels3_discussion/E021_hermes/inventory.csv 与 class_counts.csv（E021，Hermes，已接受）。图来自 newangels3_discussion/E021_hermes/fig_e021_sky_coverage.png（评审已查看），复制入 assets/。

Data: newangels3_discussion/E021_hermes/inventory.csv and class_counts.csv (E021, Hermes, accepted). Figure from newangels3_discussion/E021_hermes/fig_e021_sky_coverage.png (viewed by the reviewer), copied into assets/.

  1. E013 A2 v1 + toy MC（已完成）：谱联合似然在 14 主场的 v19 曲面上插值，对 N_MW、梯度、kT（0.185 keV）做 profile；无 M31 分量被偏好（Δstat ≤ 1.07）。单侧 95% 上限（Δstat = 2.71，插值版）见状态页表；toy-MC 覆盖率 0.975–0.984（略保守），误报率 0.069–0.086，观测上限 = toy 中位数。产出 newangels3_discussion/E013_A2_claude/（a2_ul_vs_rc_interp.csv、a2_toymc_threshold.csv、a2_ul_vs_rc.png）。 E013 A2 v1 + toy MC (done): the spectral joint likelihood interpolated on the 14 primary fields' v19 surfaces, profiling over N_MW, the gradient and kT (0.185 keV); no M31 component is preferred (Δstat ≤ 1.07). One-sided 95% UL (Δstat = 2.71, interpolated) in the state-page table; toy-MC coverage 0.975–0.984 (slightly conservative), false-detection rate 0.069–0.086, observed limits = the toy median. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E013_A2_claude/ (a2_ul_vs_rc_interp.csv, a2_toymc_threshold.csv, a2_ul_vs_rc.png).
  2. E020（已完成；RT-01 已分诊）：样本级重收敛（20 场，模型 A/B/C，多元起始）。模型 C 下 14 场均值 0.964 → 0.819 ± 0.041。红队 RT-01 分解（Claude 复核）：−15.04% 中 v19 重收敛（A）−7.65%、SP 谱形（A→B）−5.29%、线能量（B→C）−2.87%——「SP 谱形单侧 −15% 系统误差」不成立；模型 C 的 SP 谱形未经物理验证；D49 更新撤回。模型 C 曲面（A1c）降级为敏感性变体；A1d（v19 模型多元起始）成为 A2 基线。产出 newangels3_discussion/E020_luna/。 E020 (done; RT-01 triaged): the sample-wide re-convergence (20 fields, Models A/B/C, multi-start). Under Model C the 14-field mean moves 0.964 → 0.819 ± 0.041. Red team RT-01's decomposition (Claude-reproduced): of −15.04%, the v19 re-convergence (A) gives −7.65%, the SP shape (A→B) −5.29%, the line energies (B→C) −2.87% — the "one-sided −15% SP-shape systematic" does not hold; Model C's SP shapes are not physically validated; the D49 update is withdrawn. The Model-C surfaces (A1c) are demoted to a sensitivity variant; A1d (v19-model multi-start) becomes the A2 baseline. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E020_luna/.
  3. E019（已完成）：PSF 翼泄漏的实测——81 个孤立类点源叠加，最亮 bin f_leak 10.3 ± 8.6%（原值）／20.4 ± 7.8%（零点校正）；14 主场泄漏 SB 0.16（原值）／0.33（零点校正）vs E016 模型 0.12。产出 newangels3_discussion/E019_codexnim/。 E019 (done): the empirical PSF-wing leak — a stack of 81 isolated point-like sources, brightest-bin f_leak 10.3 ± 8.6% raw / 20.4 ± 7.8% null-corrected; per-field leak SB over the 14 primaries 0.16 raw / 0.33 null-corrected vs E016's model 0.12. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E019_codexnim/.
  4. E021（已完成）：档案清点与 300 kpc 图设计（无拟合）——145 ObsID，class-A 22 个，30 kpc 以外仅 8 个；产出 newangels3_discussion/E021_hermes/（inventory.csv、DESIGN.md、天区覆盖图）。 E021 (done): the archival inventory and the 300-kpc map design (no fitting) — 145 ObsIDs, 22 class A, only 8 beyond 30 kpc; outputs newangels3_discussion/E021_hermes/ (inventory.csv, DESIGN.md, the sky-coverage figure).
  5. E022（已完成）：8 个外 class-A 档案场（82–253 kpc）的 v19 + 模型 C 拟合（N_H 从 HI4PI 重建，与 v19 差 0.05–0.31 %）。v19 结果被接受为外场参考：外 IVW 0.842 ± 0.065；内禀 norm 外/内 0.80 ± 0.13；模型 C 仅作系统变体（其外场剖面误差 χ² 168/7，不能用于加权平均）。产出 newangels3_discussion/E022_luna/。 E022 (done): v19 + Model-C fits of the 8 outer class-A archival fields (82–253 kpc; N_H rebuilt from HI4PI, agreeing with v19 to 0.05–0.31 %). The v19 results are accepted as the outer reference: outer IVW 0.842 ± 0.065; intrinsic norm outer/inner 0.80 ± 0.13; Model C is a systematic variant only (its outer profile errors give χ² 168/7, unusable for a weighted mean). Outputs newangels3_discussion/E022_luna/.
  6. E023（已完成）：22 个 v19 norm（14 内 + 8 外）的联合 MW 常数 + M31 β 拟合（高斯似然，局部协方差误差）——大核晕在 20 kpc 的单侧 95% 上限 0.46（r_c=50）／0.59（r_c=100）／0.90（r_c=200）（β = 0.5）；Zhang 0.83 被排除到 r_c ≈ 125–175 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5)；无 M31 分量被偏好（Δχ²(A=0) ≤ 1.3）。Claude 已独立复算 r_c = 50/100 的上限，数值一致。产出 newangels3_discussion/E023_luna/limits.csv。下一步：在谱曲面上重做。 E023 (done): a joint MW-constant + M31-beta fit of the 22 v19 norms (14 inner + 8 outer; Gaussian likelihood on local-covariance errors) — the large-core halo's one-sided 95% UL at 20 kpc is 0.46 (r_c=50) / 0.59 (r_c=100) / 0.90 (r_c=200) for β = 0.5; Zhang 0.83 is excluded up to r_c ≈ 125–175 kpc (β = 0.4/0.5); no M31 term is preferred (Δχ²(A=0) ≤ 1.3). Claude independently recomputed the r_c = 50/100 limits and got the same values. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E023_luna/limits.csv. Next: redo it on spectral surfaces.
  7. E017a（已完成）：Paper I 星表与 v19 掩膜的交叉匹配（14 主场，MOS1）——亮源（>1e-14）掩住 95.5 %（233/244，11 个未掩）；8784 个掩膜椭圆里 87 % 无 10″ 内的 Paper I 源（掩膜来自更深的逐观测探测表）。掩膜出处缺口就此闭合。产出 newangels3_discussion/E017a_luna/。 E017a (done): the Paper I catalogue cross-matched against the v19 masks (14 primary fields, MOS1) — 95.5 % of bright sources (>1e-14) masked (233/244, 11 unmasked); of the 8784 mask ellipses 87 % have no Paper I source within 10″ (the masks come from a deeper per-observation detection list). The mask-provenance gap is thereby closed. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E017a_luna/.
  8. V01（已完成）：E020/E022 数值的独立复核（luna，直接从四个 CSV 复算，不用任何先前报告）——20 个标量比较 18 个 PASS；2 个「FAIL」只是 E020 加权径向斜率的舍入差（复算 −0.0005348 vs 声称 −0.0005；0.006051 vs 0.0061；四位小数下一致，超出 0.5 % 严格容差）。产出 newangels3_discussion/V01_luna/verify_table.csv。 V01 (done): an independent verification of the E020/E022 numbers (luna, recomputed directly from the four CSVs, no prior reports as inputs) — 18 of 20 scalar comparisons PASS; the 2 "FAILs" are rounding-only differences in E020's weighted radial slope (recomputed −0.0005348 vs claimed −0.0005; 0.006051 vs 0.0061; identical at four decimals, outside the strict 0.5 % tolerance). Outputs newangels3_discussion/V01_luna/verify_table.csv.
  9. A1c 完成 + A2 v2 final（模型 C 曲面，敏感性变体，2026-10-15 18:26Z）：A1c（codexnim）14/14 场、加密后 117 点/场，门检全过；A2 v2 final 给出插值上限（β = 0.5，r_c = 4/8/15/30 = 0.111/0.138/0.215/0.484；β = 0.4/0.6 在 r_c = 4 为 0.176/0.075），toy MC 1000 次覆盖率 0.918–0.933（低于 0.95）——Δstat = 2.71 在模型 C 曲面上略不保守，校准阈值待做（Claude TODO）；Zhang/上限（r_c ≤ 8）= 3.9–12 倍。产出 newangels3_discussion/E013_A2_claude/（a2_ul_vs_rc_interp_v2C.csv、a2_ul_vs_rc_v2C.png）。RT-01 后定位：敏感性变体，不是基线。 A1c done + A2 v2 final (Model-C surfaces, a sensitivity variant, 2026-10-15 18:26Z): A1c (codexnim) 14/14 fields, 117 points per field after densification, all gates exact; A2 v2 final gives interpolated ULs (β = 0.5, r_c = 4/8/15/30 = 0.111/0.138/0.215/0.484; β = 0.4/0.6 at r_c = 4: 0.176/0.075), with a 1000-toy MC coverage of 0.918–0.933 (below 0.95) — the Δstat = 2.71 rule is slightly anti-conservative on the Model-C surfaces, a calibrated threshold is TODO (Claude); Zhang/UL for r_c ≤ 8 = 3.9–12x. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E013_A2_claude/ (a2_ul_vs_rc_interp_v2C.csv, a2_ul_vs_rc_v2C.png). After RT-01 its status is: a sensitivity variant, not the baseline.
  10. E024 完成（2026-10-15 ~13:2xZ）+ D50 决定 + E025 完成：E024（Hermes）给出 47 个外 B 场的四种政策：P1（遮展源）+12 个方向、P2（放宽到 8–10 ks）累计 +31、P3（加 9 个 Virgo 重提取）+40、P4（加单相机）+43；全部在 b < 0；NGC 147 不可用（仅剩 22% 视场）。PI 决定 D50（2026-10-15）：P1+P2 立即拟合、6 个真正外围场 Virgo 重提取、跳过 P4、弃 NGC 147。E025（luna）照此执行：P1 12/12 掩膜审计未过 → 全部转重提取；P2 18/19 接受；干净外样本（13 场）0.846 ± 0.059，外/内 = 0.877 ± 0.072；correction 1 把 10 个 P2 a+b 场也判为掩膜不足 → 重提取清单 6 + 12 + 10 = 28 场。产出 newangels3_discussion/E024_hermes/、newangels3_discussion/E025_luna/。 E024 done (2026-10-15 ~13:2xZ) + the D50 decision + E025 done: E024 (Hermes) laid out four policies for the 47 outer class-B fields: P1 (mask extended targets) +12 directions, P2 (relax to 8–10 ks) +31 cumulative, P3 (add 9 Virgo re-extractions) +40, P4 (add one-camera fields) +43; all at b < 0; NGC 147 unusable (22% of the field of view left). The PI decided (D50, 2026-10-15): fit P1+P2 now, re-extract 6 genuinely-outer fields on Virgo, skip P4, drop NGC 147. E025 (luna) executed it: all 12 P1 fields fail the mask audit → all to re-extraction; 18/19 P2 fits accepted; the clean outer sample (13 fields) 0.846 ± 0.059, outer/inner = 0.877 ± 0.072; correction 1 found the 10 P2 a+b fields also under-masked → the re-extraction list is 6 + 12 + 10 = 28 fields. Outputs newangels3_discussion/E024_hermes/, newangels3_discussion/E025_luna/.
  11. E027 stage 0/0b（已完成，2026-10-16 06:0x–06:2xZ）+ stage 1 已派发：PI 2026-10-16 两次要求——先问 GATE/FLR_z3/MS_z3.5_core 对我们结果的改进，随后把范围改为全部 31 个 LP 080073 观测（保留多少有价值时间、降低多少误差、如何反馈 ParetoGTI 标准设计）。Stage 0/0b（灯光曲线级）：GATE 不可用（丢 5–6 个主场）；FLR_z3 与 MS_z3.5_core 清洗相同、代价不同（2–3% vs ~10% 曝光）；主要价值是覆盖（多达约 11 个非 v19 指向可能变成可用场）；谱级 S1–S4 指标已预注册。Stage 1：1a GTI 导出（lang，06:26Z 派发）→ 1b Virgo 提取（等 ssh 恢复 + E026 试点通过）→ 1c 拟合 → 1d 反馈备忘录。RT-04-T1 已并入。结果待定。 E027 stages 0/0b (done, 2026-10-16 06:0x–06:2xZ) + stage 1 dispatched: the PI's two 2026-10-16 requests — first about GATE/FLR_z3/MS_z3.5_core for the improvement to our results, then rescoped to all 31 LP 080073 observations (how much valuable time is kept, how much error is reduced, and how to feed back into ParetoGTI criterion design). Stages 0/0b (light-curve level): GATE is unusable (it drops 5–6 primaries); FLR_z3 and MS_z3.5_core clean identically at different cost (2–3% vs ~10% of the exposure); the main value is coverage (up to ~11 non-v19 pointings may become usable fields); the spectral S1–S4 metrics are pre-registered. Stage 1: 1a GTI export (lang, dispatched 06:26Z) → 1b Virgo extraction (waits for ssh's return and E026's pilot passing) → 1c fits → 1d the feedback memo. RT-04-T1 is merged in. Results Pending.
  12. 运行中，待定：A1d（v19 模型多元起始曲面，A2 的新基线，18:50Z 启动，~1240/1638，ETA ~09:30Z）；E026（28 场 Virgo 重提取；stage 0 已完成——Virgo 无 ODF 需 NXSA；stage 1 试点第 8 次尝试后 Virgo ssh 自 06:16Z 起不可达，状态未知）；红队 RT-08（A2 toy-MC 校准，报告已交 06:18Z）与 RT-09（外样本选择与清洗，运行中）。红队 RT-02…RT-07 已全部分诊完毕（见组会页）。结果出来前不引用任何数字。 Running, Pending: A1d (v19-model multi-start surfaces, the new A2 baseline, launched 18:50Z, ~1240/1638, ETA ~09:30Z); E026 (28-field Virgo re-extraction; stage 0 done — no ODFs on Virgo, NXSA needed; after the stage-1 pilot's attempt 8, Virgo ssh has been unreachable since 06:16Z, so its status is unknown); red teams RT-08 (the A2 toy-MC calibration, report filed 06:18Z) and RT-09 (outer-sample selection and cleaning, running). Red teams RT-02…RT-07 are all triaged (see the meeting page). No numbers quoted until results land.
  13. 其后：在 A1d 曲面上跑 A2 基线版（用 toy-MC 校准阈值并检查插值收敛——样条与线性一致到 10% 才引用收敛值，修复 RT-02 的卡点影响）；在谱曲面上以流量空间重做 E023（加 MW 纬度项与外场系统项）；E026 完成后把 28 个重提取场按 v19 规则拟合，在扩大的内外样本上做联合拟合；E027 stage 1 的谱结果与 ParetoGTI 反馈备忘录；E015（RASS 25° 原生计数图）；E018b 保持可选（I034：预期变化不大）。 After that: run the A2 baseline on the A1d surfaces (with a toy-MC-calibrated threshold and an interpolation-convergence check — quote the converged UL only once spline and linear agree to 10%, fixing the stuck-point impact RT-02 found); redo E023 in flux space on spectral surfaces (with an MW latitude term and an outer systematic); once E026 finishes, fit the 28 re-extracted fields under v19 rules and run the joint fit on the enlarged inner+outer sample; E027 stage 1's spectral results and the ParetoGTI feedback memo; E015 (the 25° native-count RASS map); E018b stays optional (I034: expected to change little).
  14. E015（排队）：M31 周围 25° 的 RASS 原生计数图（MW 纬度模型 + M31 中心项 + LHB 模板），为本地 MW 模型与 Local Hot Bridge 检验（O4）铺路。 E015 (queued): a 25° native-count RASS map around M31 (MW latitude model + an M31-centred term + an LHB template), paving the way for the local MW model and the Local Hot Bridge test (O4).
  15. E017b（低优先，排队）：只用 Paper I 星表重建源掩膜（需 Virgo 重提取），对比 v19 的 skyarea 与通量——E017a 的交叉匹配已把掩膜出处缺口闭合，此项仅在审稿人要求时做。 E017b (low priority, queued): rebuild the source mask from the Paper I catalogue only (needs re-extraction on Virgo) and compare skyarea and flux with v19 — E017a's cross-match has closed the mask-provenance gap, so this runs only if a referee asks.
  16. 论文讨论：把 I033 的科学线（总和、轮廓形状——含大核限制、NW 起源）与 E016/E019/E020（RT-01 后作敏感性变体）/E022/E023/E025/E017a 的新结果写进 New-ANGELS III 草稿的讨论部分；提交门槛仍按 I013。 Paper discussion: write the I033 science lines (total; profile shape — now including the large-core limit; NW origin) plus the new E016/E019/E020 (a sensitivity variant after RT-01)/E022/E023/E025/E017a results into the New-ANGELS III draft discussion; submission gates remain those of I013.

来源：cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md（2026-10-14 D48 与 2026-10-15 13Z update）；cognition-os/experiments/E013（A2 v1、toy-MC 与「A2 v2 final」节）、E019、E020（「Red-team RT-01 triage」节）、E021、E014、E016、E018a、E022（correction 1 节）、E023、E024、E025（correction 1 节）、E017a；cognition-os/insights/I013、I034；.agent/jobs/2026-10-15-v01-verify-e020-e022/REPORT.luna.md；cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D49（update 节已撤回）与 D50；cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md；.agent/LOOP_STATE.md（A1d/RT-02/RT-03/E026 运行与队列）。

Source: cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md (2026-10-14 D48 and the 2026-10-15 13Z update); cognition-os/experiments/E013 (the A2 v1, toy-MC and "A2 v2 final" sections), E019, E020 (the "Red-team RT-01 triage" section), E021, E014, E016, E018a, E022 (the correction-1 section), E023, E024, E025 (the correction-1 section), E017a; cognition-os/insights/I013, I034; .agent/jobs/2026-10-15-v01-verify-e020-e022/REPORT.luna.md; cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D49 (its update section withdrawn) and D50; cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md; .agent/LOOP_STATE.md (the A1d/RT-02/RT-03/E026 runs and the queue).

本次更新What's new

来源：cognition-os/experiments/E013（A2 v1、toy-MC 与「A2 v2 final」节）、E019、E020（「Red-team RT-01 triage」节）、E021、E018a、E016、E022（correction 1 节）、E023、E024、E025（correction 1 节）、E017a；.agent/jobs/2026-10-15-v01-verify-e020-e022/REPORT.luna.md；cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D48、D49（update 节已撤回）与 D50；cognition-os/insights/I033、I034；cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md；.agent/LOOP_STATE.md。

Source: cognition-os/experiments/E013 (the A2 v1, toy-MC and "A2 v2 final" sections), E019, E020 (the "Red-team RT-01 triage" section), E021, E018a, E016, E022 (the correction-1 section), E023, E024, E025 (the correction-1 section), E017a; .agent/jobs/2026-10-15-v01-verify-e020-e022/REPORT.luna.md; cognition-os/04_DECISION_LOG.md D48, D49 (its update section withdrawn) and D50; cognition-os/insights/I033, I034; cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md; .agent/LOOP_STATE.md.

数据截至Data as of

2026-10-16T06:26:46Z（最新读到的来源：cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md（2026-10-16T00:08Z…06:26:46Z 各行——最后一条为 06:26:46Z「E027-rescoped, E027a-dispatched」）；cognition-os/experiments/E027_gti_policy_screen.md（stage 0 表、stage 0b 表与「Stage 1 plan and pre-registration」节）；cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md（RT-06/RT-07 分诊结果、RT-08/RT-09 行）；cognition-os/insights/I033_flat_profile_bounds_concentrated_m31_and_nw_latitude_gradient.md（「Red-team RT-07 triage」节）；cognition-os/experiments/E013_joint_spatial_profile_likelihood.md 与 E023_joint_norm_beta_inner_outer.md（「Red-team RT-02 triage」节）、E016_unresolved_point_source_contribution.md（RT-05）、E014_nw_gradient_rass_omni_crosscheck.md 与 insights/I034（RT-06）、E025_outer_classB_fits.md（RT-03）；cognition-os/03_TRUST_TABLE.md 第 55/73/80/82/86/87 行；.agent/LOOP_STATE.md（A1d ~1240/1638、E027 队、Virgo ssh 不可达）newest source read: cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md (the rows from 2026-10-16T00:08Z through 06:26:46Z — the last being 06:26:46Z "E027-rescoped, E027a-dispatched"); cognition-os/experiments/E027_gti_policy_screen.md (the stage-0 and stage-0b tables and the "Stage 1 plan and pre-registration" section); cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md (the RT-06/RT-07 triage results and the RT-08/RT-09 rows); the "Red-team RT-07 triage" section of cognition-os/insights/I033_flat_profile_bounds_concentrated_m31_and_nw_latitude_gradient.md; the "Red-team RT-02 triage" sections of cognition-os/experiments/E013_joint_spatial_profile_likelihood.md and E023_joint_norm_beta_inner_outer.md, E016_unresolved_point_source_contribution.md (RT-05), E014_nw_gradient_rass_omni_crosscheck.md and insights/I034 (RT-06), E025_outer_classB_fits.md (RT-03); rows 55/73/80/82/86/87 of cognition-os/03_TRUST_TABLE.md; .agent/LOOP_STATE.md (A1d ~1240/1638, the E027 queue entry, and the Virgo ssh outage)）